RE: [xml-dev] RDF was a bully (was Re: [xml-dev] RDF and the new releases)

>0.90 was not in any way RDF-compliant.

!

see the cached version of Netscape's RSS) 0.9 spec:
http://www.purplepages.ie/RSS/netscape/rss0.90.html


If you still have any doubts, try copying the sample into the W3C RDF
validator:

http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/

Lovely graph!
Lovely triples!
Valid RDF!

A certain amount of FUD is to be expected from vendors that have staked
their reputation (and probably their dollars) on a different horse, but this
is remarkable. On xml-dev. I'm speechless.