Re: [xml-dev] more QName madness

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> The logic of this decision is as follows:  
> 
>   1) schemes are going to be popular (Simon himself has already
>      defined several);
>   2) short scheme names are likely to collide;
>   3) collision is an interop nightmare;
>   4) scheme names therefore need to incorporate domain names in some way;

4 doesn't follow. How about:

  4') scheme names therefore need to be unique in some way


Bill de hÓra

--
Propylon
www.propylon.com