Re: [xml-dev] RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?

From
Jonathan Borden <>
To
Mike Champion <>,
Date
2002-11-17T20:02:19Z
ID
<014d01c28e74$3cd3a8d0$>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
Correction:
>
> that RDFXML makes the following assertions:
>
> <#foo> rdf:type rddl:resource .
> <#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/nature> .
> <#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/purpose> .
> <#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/L.dtd> .
> <#foo> rddl:prose "<p>A description of the 'L' language>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral
.
>

<#foo> rdf:type rddl:resource .
<#foo> rddl:nature <http://example.org/nature> .
<#foo> rddl:purpose <http://example.org/purpose> .
<#foo> rddl:related <http://example.org/L.dtd> .
<#foo> rddl:prose "<p>A description of the 'L' language>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral .

This is saying roughly that a namespace is a collection of resources, each
resource has a localname, a nature, a purpose and may be associated with a
related resource. A resource may have a text desctiption.

Jonathan