>You are confusing Common Sense with Political Correctness. RDF is
>butt-ugly, confusing, and useless in its current form.
RDF/XML may be butt-ugly and confusing, but IMHO the model is quite the
opposite.
After years of
>TimBL and W3C pitching RDF hard, I have yet to see a single successful
>application of RDF that couldn't be done without RDF.
I have yet to see an XML application that couldn't be done without XML, so
that argument isn't particularly strong. The point is that in the same way a
lot of applications are considerably easier to implement using XML, quite a
few applications are considerably easier with RDF, and such practical
applications are now popping up all over the place.
>Its not the fire log that is wet, it's the damn match.
It's lit.
Cheers,
Danny.
