Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
Date
2002-11-20T17:10:10Z
ID
<r01050400-1022-ED58F6D6FCAA11D696190003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
 writes:
>I don't view XHTML 2.0 as "HTML".
>
>IE6 and below, Mozilla 1.x and below, Opera 7.x and below etc etc will
>continue to support *HTML*. I don't see that there is any realistic
>threat to HTML.

Legacy technologies merely persist.  To me, becoming a legacy technology
is very much a threat.

I still have no comprehension of why you think pulling the plug on XHTML
is remotely a good idea.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org