Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic

Shelley Powers wrote:

> Sorry, John, but this one really doesn't work. The triples are meaningless
> unless we understand how to interpret same. 

That's what the model theory is for.


> Now, Tim's document is a just a quick blurb, but
> people are already adopting it as a holy grail. 

Who is?


> So what you're saying then, is that a person will have to know the RDF model
> in order to read and write Tim's RPV?

How could be any other way?

Bill de hÓra