Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

From
<>
To
,
Date
2002-11-20T14:55:46Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
In a message dated 20/11/2002 14:43:18 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes:


<wild_supposition type="breathless">You just have to wonder why anyone would bother continually responding to obvious flame bait</wild_supposition>

Ann


Hi Ann,

I will simply observe that your response totally lacks any logical argument to support the supposition that XHTML 2.0 is a good idea or that it is relevant in the changing world which will soon be upon us.

Regards

Andrew Watt