Re: [xml-dev] canonical xml

From
Rick Jelliffe <>
To
Date
2002-11-21T06:25:50Z
ID
<022901c29126$d5e8e530$>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] canonical xml
From: "Jon Steeves" <>
 
> Doesn't the existence of a special version of canonical xml mean that there is no 
> canonical xml?

No, it means there are multiple canons (lists) for different purposes.  This is another
capitalization issue: Canonical XML is not the only canonical XML, just as 
XML Schemas are not the only XML schemas, and the XML Infoset is not the only
XML infoset. 

Cheers
Rick Jellife