Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> PS: XML can't represent objects at best it can represent C-style structs
> and even then it needs a notion of IDness to do this completely. 

Er uh yes XML can represent objects.  This is usually a bad idea, but it 
can be done.  Objects can be serialized/persisted, and pretty well 
anything that can be serialized/persisted can be dressed in XML syntax. 
  What am I missing? -Tim