Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun
There use to be a requirement that patent seekers had first to construct a working model of their invention. I realize that frivolous software is easy to construct, but that's not the point. The point of constructing such a model is that it would allow the patent examiner to see just what's being patented, rather than interpret words on a page. This may make more obvious "inventions" obviously unpatentable.
Next in thread →
Next in month →