Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services

From
Bill Kearney <>
Date
2003-02-01T00:07:56Z
ID
<003101c2c985$f9394ab0$>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
Yeah just like e-mail is a risk.

Which is, of course, what SOAP works over more than just HTTP.  ;-p

This is old bits.  There's nothing new here... move along...

Is it me or are is the tech press off on a "what can we bash this week" binge?



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <>
To: "'Rich Salz'" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services


> Probably something along these lines:
> http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0006.html
> 
> The basic idea is that SOAP is an attempt to sneak past the corporate
> firewall and get some real work done, which, of course, is a security
> problem.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rich Salz [mailto:]
> > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:28 AM
> > To: 
> > Cc: 
> > Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
> > 
> > > ERH has a thought provoking comment on his weblog today
> > > http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/
> > > The security community detests SOAP/XML-RPC/Web Services because
> they
> > > violate fundamental network security principles.
> > 
> > Hunh?  I'd like to know the basis for this claim.
> > /r$