David Megginson wrote:
> I have no objection to coming up with better ways of moving
> information around, with or without XML, but first I need (a)
> credible, repeatable field tests that prove that there's a significant
> problem, and then (b) credible, repeatable field tests that prove that
> a different format can actually solve those problems. With those
> results in hand, then we can talk about the costs and benefits (and
> whether the XML activity is the right place to try to solve the
> problem).
I'm replying to David's message just so that people will have to look at
it twice. -Tim
