Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
XML Dev <>
Date
2003-02-26T18:09:02Z
ID
<r01050400-1024-62DAE09449B511D787340003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes
 (Jeff Lowery) writes:
>My opinion is that the answer lies in a prefix registry.  I know
>that's controversial, mainly because it creates an authority structure
>that has to be consulted prior to assigning prefixes to names.  I
>think this can be mitigate, though, by having a provisional namespace
>prefix mechanism that is essentially the same as it exists now, minus
>default namespaces. Registered prefixes would then be denoted by
>special naming conventions.

I agree completely, but I get very consistent responses from various W3C
folks that URIs are the magic answers to all cases that might otherwise
have required registration.

I'd love to see such a thing, with or without the W3C's involvement, but
suspect that it's just too late at this point.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org