Guys,
I don't know why, but I almost never do same thing twice. I have worked on
Minimal-XML and Common-XML from the *minimal* and *common* perspectives of
the word *simple*. Now I am looking at the word from the *user-friendly*
and "easy-viewing" perspective. I am not looking to weed arcane features
out of XML.
What I WANT as a result of current effort is a simple and not necessarily
complete syntax that text editors and development tools will commonly
support as an alternate view of XML documents. This means XSLT and plug-ins
for browsers and editors.
What I DON'T WANT to see is this syntax being used to exchange or store
data.
Best,
Don Park
Docuverse
