RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Gavin Thomas Nicol' <>,
Date
2003-02-18T22:35:03Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
Ok, that is a deeper issue.  I am assuming 
the expert designed the schema for the 
customer, not that he gave them one from 
a standard set.   It depends on the tool 
as to how useful that is as an editing 
hint.

Or did I misunderstand your point?  

len

From: Gavin Thomas Nicol [mailto:]

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 05:01 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Not exactly although I agree that when using
> XML as The GUI, it looks the same.  The namespace
> should enable me to stay consistent with the
> driving schema.

What if I don't care? What if my system maps Nikon to the appropriate URI 
because I choose to interpret the manufacturer attribute as something 
containing an SOI?

I don't need a *standard* to tell me what a namespace means. What I need is a 
means for dealing with them once I recognize them.