"Simon St.Laurent" <> writes:
> Every time I see keys and values presented this way I conclude that
> whoever concocted this setup doesn't really give a damn about markup, so
> further discussion about the merits of the markup aspects of their
> design is likely pointless.
"Danny Ayers" <> writes:
> Sounds reasonable. The main reason I was curious is because I've done (more
> or less) a refactoring of java.util.Properties to use RDF. A possibility was
> to use a similar king of structure as you describe, with a URI for the name,
^^^^ [1]
> but as I only need this locally within an app, opted for a literals there,
> giving the simpler:
>
> <rdf:_1
> rdf:type='http://ideagraph.org/xmlns/idea/features#Feature'
> ftrs:name='defaultHtmlTemplate'
> ftrs:value='default.html'
> />
I see no disagreement between my distinguished colleagues. A judgment
on RDF and the appropriateness of URI for solving world hunger maybe.
But no contradiction.
Ari.
[1] I think structure explicit in markup *is* King.
