Re: [xml-dev] Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)
(Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes: >Why not NDATA? I think Rick Jelliffe covered this last week better than I ever will. http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200303/msg00739.html -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org