← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] What should be open/free? (Was: Low-end Office 11 w on't do user...

From
Jeff Lowery <>
To
'Uche Ogbuji' <>,
Date
2003-04-14T21:13:09Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] What should be open/free? (Was: Low-end Office 11 w on't do user...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:]
>
> ROTFL.  This is one of those crazy ideas that does not even 
> require an 
> additional word to rubbish.  Of course, I can imagine MSFT's 
> having the Dali 
> lightbulb go off over their heads and trying to slip this one 
> onto their next 
> EULA.  That would just make me laugh all the harder.

In this case, MSFT would be following some sort of precedent:

NZ's Largest ISP Owns Your Work
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/07/0243239&mode=thread&tid=158

As Pagliacci would say, "Laugh, clown. Laugh."
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →