Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:


> Or perhaps customers would be wiser to simply learn to process WordML
> and forget about the other features.  There's no risk of data loss
> there, at least based on the current (scant) information.

That would be fine if it were documented, but according to report it is not.

-- 
John Cowan  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com  
All "isms" should be "wasms".   --Abbie