(Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)) writes:
>Our only disagreement was against your judgement of "some folks" in
>your comment.
>
>IMHO the major reason behind XML's success is because it easy to
>attach semantics on it and then process them with relative ease. From
>a limited point of view, RDF is just a specialization of the above
>recipe for success.
IMHO, RDF botches the "easy" part quite thoroughly, and is hence a
recipe for success only for specialists, preferably specialists who only
care about the graphs, not the markup.
That seems to be at the heart of our disagreement, and I doubt that will
disappear.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
