Miles Sabin wrote:
> No great loss tho' (if Bill can cast his mind back that far he'd
> probably remember that the API was a bit fiddly to work with) other
> than as a proof of concept ... of which I'm sure there are others.
No more fiddly than more widely used ones, as I recall ;)
To be honest, the lexical stuff around attributes could go in a
future version of XML without the (my) sky falling in - dual quote
styles and unordered attributes, we could be shot of those right?
Ignorable whitespace is another matter tho'.
Bill de hÓra
