Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging

From
Amelia A.Lewis <>
To
Date
2003-04-18T23:37:09Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Reply-to munging
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:41:27 -0500
"Hunsberger, Peter" <> wrote:
> I've been using mailing lists off and on for some 20 years now and
> this is the first one I've encountered that behaves this way.
> Personally, I find it a pain that dialogue by default is "off list",
> maybe I'm just too used to"open source" mind sets (where off list is a
> bad thing)...

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Munging is not associated with open source, necessarily.  It all depends
upon which side of the religious issue (as represented by the above URL,
the first I got with the google search string "reply-to munging
considered harmful") the list administrator is on.

In a nutshell, reply-to munging excludes the use of the reply-to header
by an individual, because if used, the list will overwrite it.  If the
capability happeens to be needed, it's lost irremediably.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis                    amyzing {at} talsever.com
What makes me think I could start clean-slated?
        The hardest to learn was the least complicated.
                                                -- Emily Saliers