Re: [xml-dev] Data vs. Process was Re: [xml-dev] Vocabulary Combination ...

From
Thomas B. Passin <>
To
XML DEV <>
Date
2003-06-01T21:32:40Z
ID
<006a01c32885$5460fe70$6401a8c0@tbp1>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Data vs. Process was Re: [xml-dev] Vocabulary Combination ...
[Miles Sabin]

> Jonathan Borden wrote,
> > When a pharmacist sees a drug interaction that the doctor hasn't, the
> > intention is to flag this, and contact the doctor for more
> > instructions ... this is exactly what ontologies (and schemata in
> > general) are great at: spotting inconsistencies.
>
> Uh huh ...
>
> And to bring this back to the starting point of this thread: haven't you
> just described a _process_?

It's more like one of Walter Perry's third-party enhancements that was not
part of the original design.

Cheers,

Tom P