"Chiusano Joseph" <> wrote:
|> in any document using the a1 vocabulary, how can "StateCode" in the
|> sense of the a2 vocabulary be used? Well, just use it!
| If the 2 schemas (agency 1 and agency 2) shared the same namespace
| (perhaps an overall "superagency" namespace), then name collision would
| occur.
Only if (a) the combined schema insisted on using the same names as is
*and* (b) insisted on "GI only" as the only basis for discrimination.
To enable (a), one has merely to abandon (b). It's a fallacy anyway
(deriving from the more basic fallacy that vocabulary specific names must
somehow always occur in syntactically visible positions.)
