> >
> >Is the XSLT 1.0 described by Mike Kay's book in 938 pages
> more complex
> >than the XSLT 1.0 described by the specification in 45
> pages?
>
> This is an especially tough problem for those of us who earn
> our livings writing and editing books on these subjects.
>
And it's just as tough for those of us who are moonlighting authors!
I haven't yet decided how to tackle this problem in doing an XSLT 2.0
Programmer's Reference. It will almost certainly have to be less
comprehensive than the 1.0 version, or no-one will buy it.
I've got various ideas, and you'll have to wait and see what I (and the
publishers) come up with.
Michael Kay
