RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

From
Dare Obasanjo <>
To
Erik Bruchez <>,
Date
2003-06-19T17:53:24Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
<broken-record>This mentality is everything that is wrong with XML development today</broken-record>

________________________________

From: Erik Bruchez [mailto:]
Sent: Thu 6/19/2003 10:45 AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0



Uche Ogbuji wrote:


 >>it is definitely not standard
 >
 > What do you mean?  What do you call "standard"?

No time to go through the archives so here is my "facile" answer: I
call standard a specification released by one of the major standard
bodies out there, such as W3C, ECMA, ISO, etc. I understand why this
may or may not be important to different people so no need to start a
big argument here, but if you can summarize your position in a
sentence or two go ahead.