Re: XPath Data Model proposal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Norman Walsh <> was heard to say:
| / John Cowan <> was heard to say:
| | In my previous posting, archived at 
| | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0169.html ,
| | I forgot to mention that xsi:nil should also be recognized directly
| | from the Infoset.
|
| Yes, thank you. That's been pointed out several times and was, in
| fact, supposed to be fixed before the LC draft, but somehow I missed
| it.

Sorry folks, the preceding paragraph says exactly the *opposite* of
what I meant. I think I misread the last word of John's last sentence
as "PSVI" not "Infoset". It must be because they have so many letters
in common :-/

I have been persuaded that the current data model text *incorrectly*
references the "xsi:nil" attribute information item. It should only
refer to the PSVI [nil] property.

A thousand apologies for the confusion. And a thousand more for the
screams of outrage I fear this correction will incite. :-/

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
    | Science is like sex: sometimes something
XML Standards Architect | useful comes out, but that is not the reason
Web Tech. and Standards | we are doing it.--Richard Feynman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+4LMZOyltUcwYWjsRAiNPAJ428NuKPK7PCPi3gbYp06a/dOjo5QCggQUC
15UfJ58XPmUjNom2+dZWxXY=
=zu9S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----