Re: [xml-dev] Looking for an example of a name colliision

John Cowan <> wrote:
| Arjun Ray scripsit:

|> True.  As far as this idea goes, it's probably "safer" to have the
|> attribute assert "XSLTness" rather than "literalness".
| 
| How is this explicit attribute in each element to be distinguished from
| a convention whereby we insert a *single* attribute into the document
| which says "Any element whose GI begins with the following characters
| has XSLTness?"

One convention doesn't need (or use) colonification (or name munging of
any kind).