RE: [xml-dev] Following up ... a "Living without W3C Namespaces" manifesto?

 (Sean McGrath) writes:
>What does the word "local" mean?

Whatever it means sort of vaguely near you. ;-)

>We need a way of handling the problems that avoids artificial and
>ephemeral context boundaries such as local and non-local.

I tend to use "local" to avoid people forcing "artificial and ephemeral
context boundaries" into my work, but maybe there's a better way of
expressing this, since local/non-local isn't a clear boundary on the
best of days.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org