Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)

From
Allen Razdow <>
To
Tim Bray <>
Date
2003-08-01T03:23:34Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
well, like ontologies, I suppose a schema must underlie any XML data,
even if no one bothered to write it down explicitly, no?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:53 PM
To: Allen Razdow
Cc: 

Allen Razdow wrote:

>  In contrast, XML represents data
> as annotated trees in a standard syntax ruled by Schemas

No, not ruled by Schemas.  A substantial proportion of XML has never 
felt the touch of a Schema of any kind and works fine.

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)
Next in thread → Next in month →