Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
Date
2003-08-01T00:38:09Z
ID
<r02000000-1026-6CA42436C3B811D794470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
 (Mike Champion) writes:
>There are some increasingly important corner cases where all this is
>needed except that there is NOT that excess capacity that XML
>text/markup processing requires.  People are trying to figure how to
>have most of the XML cake and eat it too: Keep Infosets, XPath, DOM,
>XSLT, XQuery, validation, etc.; give up some interoperability, but get
>back some performance.  You may well be right that XML is ultimately
>destined to be more trouble than it's worth in such scenarios, but it
>will take a lot of failed experiments to prove that.  Don't hold your
>breath.

I didn't think it would happen within breath-holding time.  The
experiments have barely begun.  Even if it doesn't happen at the
meeting, I hope it happens in practice, over time.  Give binary formats
some momentum of their own again and see what happens.

 

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org