Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> "This WS-Federation Specification is an initial public draft release and
> is provided for review and evaluation only. BEA, IBM, Microsoft, RSA
> Security and VeriSign hope to solicit your contributions and suggestions
> in the near future."
>
> I think the reasoning is that the spec is not yet ripe enough for public
> comments.
Then perhaps it has no business being aired in public (but I doubt
that's the reason anyway Joe).
> The authors of the Specification intend to submit a revised version of
> the Specification to a standards body with a commitment to grant a
> royalty-free license to their necessary patents. We need assurance that
> your feedback and discussions are consistent with that goal.
> </Announcement>
That would be good, but it would be better if there was just one.
There are enough (some, half-baked) reliability specs out there.
> So that is 3 out of (approximately) 18 GSA specifications. My hope is
> that more GXA specifications will follow suit.
Aside from the obvious 'why do we need 18 ws-glob specs?'.. is
anybody implementing these things?
Bill de hÓra
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com
