wrote:
>> So, having now done one serious (albeit small) project with RelaxNG, I
>> really REALLY wonder why anyone would use anything else?
> While WSDL 1.2 fixes this, it is not yet a recommendation. And WSDL 1.1
> states, "For maximum interoperability and platform neutrality, WSDL
> prefers the use of XSD as the canonical type system, and treats it as
> the intrinsic type system."
Any reason you couldn't work it out in RelaxNG, and then use the
generated XSD in the WSDL?
--
Cheers, Tim Bray
(ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)
