Re: [xml-dev] About the number for productions in [XML 1.0SE]

Collin scripsit:
> I find that the number for productions in [XML 1.0 SE] is not consecutive.
> For example, there are production [32] and production [39]. However, productions [33]~[38] are missing.

They were deleted by an erratum, as they were not actually referenced
by any other production, and overlapped what RFC 1766/3066 (which is
normatively referenced) said anyhow.

> (Were they deleted for some reason?)
> 
> Collin

-- 
John Cowan    www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths
led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen.  I am the clue-finder,
the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number.  --Bilbo