← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
"''" <>,
Date
2003-07-23T16:02:48Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
One where indemnification clauses are standard business 
contract items and in which assuming that risk for 
open source could make it more expensive than other 
options.  Risk management is essential to credible 
competition because one does this on behalf of the 
customer.  The contract is made by liquidation 
obligations.  If the open source community does 
not assume those obligations, they are not credible. 

This isn't a technology sand pile.

len


From:  [mailto:]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <> writes:

> intended, but that is how open source can become a credible 
> competitor. 

Following Dare's lead, I'll ask Len what world he lives in. "Can
become"? Time to get your head out of the sand.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread