Bob Foster writes:
> > Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone?
>
> In case anyone doesn't know, there is an xml-technology specific
> newsgroup: comp.text.xml. It seems of real use to people who are,
> e.g., having trouble using XML Schema or DTDs, and the "Is XML a
> bagel or a database?" kind of question usually draws a constructive
> response.
I think that the problem for some people is that xml-dev often becomes
xml-phi. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but the set of people
who like to build software and the set of people who like to debate
abstract issues intercept only to a small extent.
I doubt that an xml-phi list would prove all that popular, though,
since the philosophers need an audience other than each-other.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, , http://www.megginson.com/
