RE: [xml-dev] InkML

I agree.  Checkbox compatibility is a good phrase to 
describe this kind of design.

len

From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:]

 (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>Is the syntax of InkML really opaque? 

1125 18432'23'43"7"-8 3-5+7  -3+6+2+6 8+3+6:T;+2+4:*T;+3+6+3-6:FF;

>But it is still XML.

So long as you wrap it in a start tag and an end tag, base64 is also
XML.  Great.

InkML has checkbox compatibility with XML.  That buys very little.