← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?

From
dbexlist <>
To
Jonathan Robie <>, pop3 <>
Date
2003-08-26T23:54:40Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
Do you really want me to dust off the textbooks and go look it up?

Regards,

Larry Bradshaw

At 11:18 AM 8/26/2003 -0400, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>At 02:58 PM 8/25/2003, pop3 wrote:
>>Personally, I would like to see XML proofs in line with Knuth's work and 
>>Codd's. Proofs that justify its existence, and define its scope and usefulness.
>
>OK, I'll bite. Which of Codd's proofs did that for the relational model?
>
>Jonathan
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →