Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)

From
Bob Foster <>
To
John Cowan <>, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <>
Date
2003-08-04T22:22:04Z
ID
<01ed01c35ad6$d8012240$6701a8c0@snobird>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
From: "John Cowan" <>
> Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:
>
> > Hmm.  An interesting insight into the software business:
> > it undervalues the IP of already compiled and sold products
> > enormously.
>
> Or maybe it assigns the correct use value to unmaintained code: $0.

Even if previously well-maintained, the value of code without the developers
who wrote/maintained it is often $0.

Even if well-maintained and knowledgeable developers available, if in "needs
to be rewritten" state, value is $0.

(In fact, often when code crosses the "needs to be rewritten" line, the
value of the company is $0. ;-)

Bob Foster