RE: [xml-dev] file extensions best practice

> -----Original Message-----
> From: am [mailto:] 
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 20:26
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] file extensions best practice
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christian Nentwich [mailto:]
> > The cons (?):
> > 
> > - The files are not recognisable as XML files anymore and 
> the standard 
> > XML editors won't list them
> > - Web servers won't generate the correct headers unless reconfigured
> > - The space for 3 digit file prefixes is small, and ours would look 
> > like .x?? which make sthe space even smaller
> > 
> > Is there anything I'm missing? What are people's opinions on this?
> 
> What about appending the file type to the filename, and keep 
> the xml extension:
> 
> blabla1_book.xml
> blabla2_book.xml
> 
> or   book_blabla1.xml
>      book_blabla2.xml 
> ?


Then, what about:

	Blabla1.book.xml
	Blabla2.book.xml 

?

I have used something like the following for some time:

	Mydocument.doc.zip

which I think makes it clear that it is a ".doc" inside a ".zip".

Alessandro Triglia


> 
> 
> Adrian Maier
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
<http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>