Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> (Jonathan Borden) writes:
>> No! At least not in the case of RDF/OWL whose semantic models are
>> defined around the concepts of sets where shared semantics can be
>> defined as the intersection of any two or more party's semantics. That
>> is the whole point.
>
> Odd. I don't think of semantics as something I want formalized to the
> point where I can calculate intersections.
I didn't mean to imply that you could *calculate* intersections. The
intersection is the shared part, whatever is outside the intersection
is your own private Idaho.
FWIW
Jonathan
