Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] Office (was RE: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML)

From
John Cowan <>
To
"Simon St.Laurent" <>
Date
2003-11-05T13:32:48Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Office (was RE: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML)
Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> (Unless, of course, you just want to buy a copy to convert your
> documents to WordML, then use XSLT or similar tools to convert it to a
> cleaner XML format that's more easily stored, processed, etc.  

In which case OpenOffice.org 1.1 is a win on every count: better price and
better XML better documented.  Run your documents through that instead.

-- 
XQuery Blueberry DOM                            John Cowan
Entity parser dot-com                           
    Abstract schemata                           http://www.reutershealth.com
    XPointer errata                             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Infoset Unicode BOM                                 --Richard Tobin
Next in thread → Next in month →