(Rich Salz) writes:
>> I fear a lot of us have been backed into dogmatism or perhaps even
>> didacticism by the perverse activities of the organization you
>> represent. There likely were better paths worth considering than
>> "this is just text", but the amount of pain the W3C has inflicted in
>> its specifications for creating typed XML has left a lot of us
>> convinced that such work is foolish, pointless, or dangerous.
>
>I'd feel a little better if you included "and its members" whenever
>you go off like that.
You're absolutely right. Thanks for the correction!
