Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)

xml-dev · November 2003 · 14 messages · back to month

#	Subject	From	Date
00674	Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Michael Rys	2003-11-19 01:01
00906	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Bob Wyman	2003-11-25 17:43
00863	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Dare Obasanjo	2003-11-25 18:28
00850	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Dare Obasanjo	2003-11-25 18:28
00862	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Michael Rys	2003-11-25 20:46
00866	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Dare Obasanjo	2003-11-25 20:56
00892	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Bob Wyman	2003-11-25 21:04
00835	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Bob Wyman	2003-11-25 21:33
00820	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Michael Rys	2003-11-25 21:59
00878	RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Michael Rys	2003-11-26 00:59
00886	Re: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Alaric B Snell	2003-11-26 01:51
00940	Re: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Tim Bray	2003-11-26 03:19
00934	Re: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Simon St.Laurent	2003-11-26 13:12
00948	Re: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)	Michael Leventhal	2003-11-27 07:37