RE: [xml-dev] RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?

John Cowan wrote...
>  scripsit:
> 
> > I'm a dochead, and the answer's simple for me. XSD is way 
> too complex
> > to write, and it has some annoying shortcomings. I'd go 
> with DTDs (and
> > so far, my clients do, too) but if we absolutely must have something
> > else, then Relax NG seems far more accessible.
> 
> DTDs are just a third syntax for RELAX NG.  :-)


Ah, that explains it. :-)
Docheads, unite!

/Ari