| 00262 |
Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Jonathan Borden
|
2004-01-08 01:09 |
| 00240 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
2004-01-08 02:43 |
| 00241 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2004-01-08 04:00 |
| 00177 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
[email protected]
|
2004-01-08 10:06 |
| 00185 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Eric van der Vlist
|
2004-01-08 10:25 |
| 00172 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Bob Foster
|
2004-01-08 10:46 |
| 00189 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Eric van der Vlist
|
2004-01-08 11:24 |
| 00244 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
John Cowan
|
2004-01-08 12:06 |
| 00174 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
[email protected]
|
2004-01-08 12:18 |
| 00186 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
[email protected]
|
2004-01-08 12:22 |
| 00176 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
John Cowan
|
2004-01-08 12:39 |
| 00182 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
John Cowan
|
2004-01-08 12:39 |
| 00259 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
2004-01-08 12:52 |
| 00206 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
David Tolpin
|
2004-01-08 13:02 |
| 00216 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
2004-01-08 13:03 |
| 00203 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
John Cowan
|
2004-01-08 13:04 |
| 00250 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
John Cowan
|
2004-01-08 13:17 |
| 00265 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Bjoern Hoehrmann
|
2004-01-08 13:25 |
| 00253 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2004-01-08 13:41 |
| 00205 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Michael Kay
|
2004-01-08 14:03 |
| 00258 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Michael Kay
|
2004-01-08 14:11 |
| 00204 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
John Cowan
|
2004-01-08 14:16 |
| 00219 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Michael Kay
|
2004-01-08 14:28 |
| 00201 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
David Tolpin
|
2004-01-08 14:53 |
| 00229 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Micah Dubinko
|
2004-01-08 16:55 |
| 00279 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Tim Bray
|
2004-01-08 17:59 |
| 00320 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2004-01-08 18:20 |
| 00365 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Jonathan Borden
|
2004-01-10 14:54 |
| 00347 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2004-01-10 15:15 |
| 00301 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Richard Tobin
|
2004-01-10 19:03 |
| 00271 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Michael Kay
|
2004-01-10 23:39 |
| 00329 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2004-01-10 23:45 |
| 00393 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Tim Bray
|
2004-01-11 07:07 |
| 00378 |
Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Simon St.Laurent
|
2004-01-11 12:19 |
| 00437 |
RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
|
Michael Kay
|
2004-01-11 17:35 |
