Re: Schema vs Schema-free (was: RE: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl)

From
Elliotte Rusty Harold <>
To
Date
2004-04-13T18:51:13Z
ID
<p06010214bca1e6ac57c9@[192.168.254.88]>
Thread
Re: Schema vs Schema-free (was: RE: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl)
At 2:07 PM -0400 4/13/04, Bob Wyman wrote:

>	Certainly, it is sometimes important to ensure that leading
>zeros, gratuitous "+" signs, etc. are passed through systems
>untouched. However, it is important to understand that the importance
>varies depending on whether or not you are working with a schema.

It does not depend on whether *you* are working with a schema. It 
depends on whether *everyone* is working with the *same* schema. The 
assumption that there is a single unique schema, which everyone 
agrees to and adheres to is a common fallacy in the XML world.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA