Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)

From
William J. Kammerer <>
To
Date
2004-05-02T17:02:54Z
ID
<02ff01c43067$542ce690$6401a8c0@oemcomputer>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
Ahh... the beauty of standards.  There's only one way to interpret ISO
8601 dates. 2004-02-05 unambiguously means "5th February."

William J. Kammerer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Kay" <>
To: "'K. Ari Krupnikov'" <>; <>
Sent: Sunday, 02 May, 2004 12:46 PM
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was
Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)


> Should we call the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
> /Unamerican/?
>
> https://164.214.2.62/dafif/dafif_0405_ed7/docs/ed8/ddd/datacov.doc
>
> I'm not sure they use the term DD in /quite/ the same way you do
> though.
>

Their site appears to have a security certificate that expired on 5th
February, or possibly 2nd May.

Michael Kay