On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:29:46 +0000, Sean B. Palmer
<> wrote:
> This specification has been developed by a group of RSS 1.0 users
> including myself who sought not just to resolve the various bugs therein
> but also to improve the integrity of the specification in general, and
> provide RELAX NG and RDF Schemata.
Thanks for the announcement. Those of us who don't belong to the
rss-dev group would be grateful for a bit of history. What made you
decide to make another RSS fork? Is the rss-dev group responsible for
RSS 1.x inactive or unresponsive, or are there some fundamental
architectural disagreements?
Thanks, and all the best,
David
--
http://www.megginson.com/
