Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?

From
David Carlisle <>
To
Date
2005-03-04T11:19:00Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
> imo that's an ugly character, the  "�" symbol.

That symbol would be immediately understoood by countless mathematicians
all over the world whereas unexpected english words in the middle of an
expression would make formulae harder to understand even if English is
your spoken language, and perhaps unintelligible if it is not.
I suppose you don't like an upside down A for "for all" or a backwards E
for "there exists" either?


David


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________